Love & XQ app for iPhone and iPad
Developer: Catasta Technologies LLP
First release : 09 Oct 2013
App size: 4.62 Mb
Disclaimer: The result does not absolute value of sexual appetite but a subjective result similar to face reading results
The creator made every man very unique in his shape, character and skills. But you can guess and predict "he is a potential guy" or "she has the capability to manage this" just by looking at a persons face. This is because creator has certain pattern of face shape for certain skills or characters irrespective of the race. Facegenome put together traditional face reading concepts to help business world and to the general public. Face reading is evolved through thousands of years starting from Aristotle time.
This app measures Love & Sexual appetite of a person based on scientific findings, traditional, Western, Indian and Chinese Face reading concepts (applicable to age 18+) evolved through thousands of years similar to yoga. A mathematical model is used to arrive a scoring in the scale of 0 through 100. This should NOT be treated as an alternative to any medical examination. It should be considered as indicative scoring. The result will reflect similar to a face reading result. Please SWIPE LEFT to start. Please SWIPE through the pages and choose the closest answer to the questions. After answering all the questions, you will be presented with a score! Women can use this as precaution tool while traveling or while alone to stay away from men who score more than XQ score of 90.
How to operate on this app
It is as simple as SWIPE LEFT OR RIGHT and respond to the questions by taping the closest match you can think of. If you like this app (we bet on this), you can share this apps download link to your friends. Who knows? It could be a revelation of many hidden tastes!
A word on scoring
Sexual appetite score generated by this app is based on statistical study of thousands of people especially known for high sexual interest. Remember the sexual appetite score does not show the fertility levels of a person. The possibility of a wrong result is as low as 5 to 10% based on our extensive experiments on numerous samples.